This is not a review, since I cannot find fault with this book and
therefore would come across as utterly bias. It’s not a study, an essay, an
exploration or any of the things this book deserves, (and, unsurprisingly, has
been subject to for decades). This is an entreaty, to writers everywhere, to
get yourselves a copy.
It was the best of times, it was the
worst of times…
For me, just reading those famous words was a thrill. Charles
Dickens’ classic, A Tale Of Two Cities, was finally mine to discover. I
expected everything people say about his work – pages of exposition marring an
otherwise entertaining storyline – but I was wrong. The showing instead of telling was at times breathtaking.
The use of original, detailed descriptions for emotions, settings and beats
(actions that break up dialogue), put our modern day clichés to shame. The mystery and suspense built upon itself
with more strength, complexity and eventual closure than anything I’ve ever
read before, and I’m genuinely afraid I’ll never enjoy anything as much again.
Everything a writer must do is hidden within these pages, but
don’t think you can’t be won over as a reader too. What with murder, romance,
satire, mystery, drama and the cold reality that this was based on genuine
historical events, it’s no surprise that I found myself laughing, crying sobbing
into my own snotty jumper sleeve, and holding my breath as I read. Having said
that, I do believe writers will gain the most from this book, and since it’s
clear I could rave about this for hours if I let myself, I’ll just leave you
with some examples of what I’m talking about. And if you’re still in any doubt,
just remember that if you’ve got an e-reader you can download this for free in
about two seconds, so go do that. Now.
Examples. (Because I’m a nerd and I love ‘em!)
- Using ordinary settings to foreshadow the mood of the novel:
- Omnipresent narration:
The time was to come, when that wine too would be spilled on the
street-stones, and when the stain of it would be red upon many there.
- Showing instead of telling, using the (now-cliched) beat of someone blushing:
- Symbolism (knitting being both a tool for characterization and a recurring metaphor for the oppressed class’ growing desire for revolution):
And there you have it. Rant. Over.
I really like that narration about the wine, I may just have to find this book now...
ReplyDeleteYou should read it in context. It comes out of nowhere and sends a chill right through you. :)
DeleteThat's exactly what I thought. The wine definitely got me. And yet I've always heard that Dickens was kind of terrible.
DeleteI love this book; the ending always upsets me.
ReplyDeleteBut Bleak House is my absolute favourite Dickens' novel.
I cried my eyes out at the end! Haven't been so sad but happy but sad at myself for being happy in ages.
Deletei started the book when i was younger, never finished it...you have peeked my interest again
ReplyDeleteYes the first chapter is a little slow and the whole thing takes some dedication at first but my gosh is it worth it. :)
DeleteThe Tale of Two Cities was the first Dickens' novel I ever read and I was hooked ever after on this author. So Dickens has a lot of exposition - when you write it as well as he then why not?
ReplyDeleteGreat examples, Kat.
@ Lisa: Don't thank me, thank the D-man.:P
ReplyDelete@ Alice: Me too. It's tragic.